Scott, Michael et al v. G.B.C.I., et al
| Michael Scott |
| G.B.C.I., D.O.C, J. Perttu, John Kind, S. Eckstein, C. O'Donnell and B. Hompe |
| 3:2018cv00068 |
| January 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Brown |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER that Plaintiff Michael Scott's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, dkt. 59 , is DENIED. Plaintiff has struck out under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and his appeal is not taken in good faith. Plaintiff's motion requesting free transcripts, dkt. 58 , is DENIED. The clerk of court is requested to insure that plaintiff's obligation to pay the $505is reflected in this court's financial records. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 9/25/2019. (rks),(ps) Corrected signature date on 9/26/2019 (rks).
|
|
Filing
50
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER denying plaintiff's 15 motion for relief from retaliation. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 5/30/2018. (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Dismissing 1 Complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. Amended Complaint due 3/19/2018. Plaintiff's 6 Motion for Assistance in Recruiting Counsel is denied. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 2/26/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
