Wilson, David et al v. Dittman, Michael et al
Plaintiff: David M. Wilson
Defendant: Michael Dittman, Meredith Mashak, Fry, Arnold, Dittman, Zahrte, Chatman, Brianna Nowak and Ahlers
Case Number: 3:2018cv00360
Filed: May 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
County: Columbia
Presiding Judge: William M. Conley
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER that plaintiff David Wilson's claims that (1) defendant Chatman gave him the wrong medication on March 4, 2016, and refused to correct the problem, (2) defendant Ahlers denied him his pain medication on December 31, 2017, and altered his medication card, and (3) for injunctive relief against defendant Dittman against the policy permitting correctional officers to dispense medication, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for his failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. The clerk of court is directed to close this case and enterjudgment in favor of defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 3/28/2022. (jef),(ps)
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (dkt. 47 ) is DENIED. In accordance with Pavey v. Conley, 544 F.3d 739 (7th Cir. 2008), the Clerk of Court is directed to schedule a Zoom evidentiary hearing to determine whether plaintiff David M. Wilson exhausted his administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), with respect to his claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 9/7/2021. (kmd),(ps)
October 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER that plaintiff David Wilson's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. Plaintiff may have until November 1, 2019, to submit an amended complaint that meets the requirements of Rule 8. Plaintiff's motion to amend complaint (dkt. 23 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (dkt. 21 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 10/11/2019. (rks),(ps)
May 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 136.99 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 6/7/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 5/23/2018. (jef),(ps)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson, David et al v. Dittman, Michael et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David M. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Dittman
Represented By: Corey Francis Finkelmeyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Meredith Mashak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dittman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zahrte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chatman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brianna Nowak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ahlers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?