Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Brooks v. Berger et al
as 1:2026cv01103
Plaintiff:
Keith J Brooks
Defendant:
Berger, Attorney Thillman, WI Attorney General Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fry v. Portco Corporation
as 3:2026cv05649
Plaintiff:
Tyler M Fry
Defendant:
Portco Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Alakhras v. Fry et al
as 4:2026cv11902
Plaintiff:
Youssef K. Alakhras
Defendant:
Laurie A. Fry, Joel Knight, Janak Bhausar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fry v. Michigan Truck Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv01819
Plaintiff:
Duane Dean Fry
Defendant:
Michigan Truck Solutions LLC and Craig A. Scholten
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Benton v. Boyer et al
as 2:2026cv04051
Plaintiff:
Deborah Benton
Defendant:
Josh Boyer, Stephen Borowsky, Arizona Attorney General's Office and others
Intervenor:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jonathon Mark v. Nicholas Fry, et al
as 26-2220
Plaintiff:
JONATHON M. MARK
Defendant:
NICHOLAS FRY, Correctional Officer and JOHN/JANE DOE, Sergeant
Yoshimoto, et al. v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., et al.
as 26-3587
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN BARROGA, WARREN YOSHIMOTO, SEAN KETTLEY and others
Defendant:
ALASKA AIRLINES, INC. and ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC.
Alakhras #976358 v. Fry et al
as 1:2026cv01679
Plaintiff:
Youssef K. Alakhras #976358
Defendant:
Laurie A. Fry, Joel Knight, Janak Bhausar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fry v. Neal et al
as 3:2026cv00670
Plaintiff:
Datwone B Fry
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Dawn Buss and Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
