Boyd, Ivan et al v. Kussmaul et al
| Ivan Boyd |
| Mumm, Kussmaul, Pitzer, Parish, Lathrop, Timothy Bromeland, Anderson, Rieck, A. Drone and Jolinda Waterman |
| WCI Prison Facility and WSPF Prison Facility |
| 3:2018cv00768 |
| September 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Prisoner (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Partial Filing fee received: $4.86, receipt number 34690033036. (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Ivan Boyd assessed an initial partial filing fee of $4.86 due 10/24/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 10/2/2018. (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing 5
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Ivan Boyd. (nln),(ps) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/2/2018: #1 IPP Calculation) (nln).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER on ifp request: Trust Fund Account Statement due 10/11/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 9/19/2018. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice from the Clerk regarding the Prisoner E-Filing Program. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner E-Filing Information Packet) (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing 2
Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Ivan Boyd. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ivan Boyd. (Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley.) (jef)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
