Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Rivera v. Howard et al
as 1:2026cv01153
Plaintiff:
Michael Angel Rivera
Defendant:
Sgt. William Howard, LT Audrey Evans, LT. Heather Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gertner et al
as 1:2026cv07216
Plaintiff:
Murray Gertner, Robert Guthoff, Thomas Halton and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Martin Jonassen, et al v. BOP, et al
as 26-2969
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MR. PERKINS and others
Martin Jonassen, et al v. BOP, et al
as 26-2968
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MR. PERKINS and others
Flores v. Lathrop Logistics LLC et al
as 2:2026cv02600
Plaintiff:
Niceforo Flores
Defendant:
Lathrop Logistics LLC and C&S Wholesale Grocers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Wilk v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2026cv06634
Plaintiff:
Amber M Wilk
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Officer Jason Lathrop and Officer Joseph Bonacci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Callis v. Schuler et al
as 3:2026cv00735
Plaintiff:
Philip Lance Callis
Defendant:
Joseph M. Schuler, Ann Elizabeth Callis, Mark C Goldenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jonassen, et al. v. Jacquez, et al.
as 26-3123
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN
Defendant:
I. JACQUEZ, D. SUH, B. CRAY and others
Henderson v. Hundly et al
as 3:2026cv00616
Plaintiff:
Bryan Henderson
Defendant:
Hundly, Robert Starwalt, Habing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
