Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wilk v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2026cv06634
Plaintiff:
Amber M Wilk
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Joseph Bonacci and Officer Jason Lathrop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Callis v. Schuler et al
as 3:2026cv00735
Plaintiff:
Philip Lance Callis
Defendant:
Joseph M. Schuler, Ann Elizabeth Callis, Mark C Goldenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jonassen, et al. v. Jacquez, et al.
as 26-3123
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN
Defendant:
I. JACQUEZ, D. SUH, B. CRAY and others
Henderson v. Hundly et al
as 3:2026cv00616
Plaintiff:
Bryan Henderson
Defendant:
Hundly, Robert Starwalt, Habing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026at00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Lathrop v. Evans et al
as 1:2026cv00804
Plaintiff:
Dontey Lathrop
Defendant:
Malik D. Evans, David M. Smith, William M. Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026at00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Martin Jonassen, et al v. BOP, et al
as 26-1683
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MR. PERKINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
