Upthegrove, Samuel et al v. Jess, Cathy et al
| Samuel S. Upthegrove |
| Cathy A. Jess, Kevin Kallas, Ryan Baumann, Scott Eckstein, John Kind, Jon Litscher, Jay Van Lanen and Steve Schueler |
| GBCI Prison Facility |
| 3:2018cv00847 |
| October 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Prisoner (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Warden PLRA Letter. (jef),(ps) |
| Motion for In Forma Pauperis Screening. (jef),(ps) |
| Partial Filing fee received: $ 44.58, receipt number 34690033151. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 4
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Samuel S. Upthegrove assessed an initial partial filing fee of $44.58 assessed due 11/13/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 10/22/2018. (nln),(ps)
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Plaintiff Samuel S. Upthegrove. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (nln),(ps) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/22/2018: #2 IPP Calculation) (nln). |
| Filing 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Samuel S. Upthegrove. (jef),(ps) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Samuel S. Upthegrove. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley.) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (jef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
