Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Johnson v. Stevens et al
as 2:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
Michael S Johnson
Defendant:
Christopher Stevens, Michelle Haese, John Kind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Van Lanen et al
as 2:2023cv00943
Plaintiff:
Cazionn Williams
Defendant:
Jay Van Lanen, Gregory Friedel and John Diedrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio Smith v. John Kind, et al
as 22-2870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO M. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN KIND, JAY VAN LANEN, TIMOTHY RETZLAFF and others
Stevens v. Ritchie et al
as 2:2022cv00958
Plaintiff:
Brandyn M Stevens
Defendant:
Rachelle Ritchie, William Pollard, John Kind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson, Titus v. Radtke, Dylan et al
as 2:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
Titus Henderson
Defendant:
Warden Dylan Radtke, Kevin Carr, Zitek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Van Lanen
as 1:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
Lydell Washington
Defendant:
Jay Van Lanen, Sgt. Brunner and Shortsize
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victor Brown v. Daniel LaVoie, et al
as 22-1585
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR R. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL L. LAVOIE, JAY VAN LANEN, DREW WEYCKER and others
David Schlemm v. Brendan Pizzala, et al
as 21-2860
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. SCHLEMM
Defendant / Appellee:
BRENDAN PIZZALA, JAY VAN LANEN and MICHAEL DONOVAN
Jones v. Vanden Plas et al
as 2:2021cv01086
Plaintiff:
Melvin Jones
Defendant:
CO Paige Vanden Plas, CO Alex Vanden Plas, CO John Diedrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson, Titus v. Elsinger, James et al
as 3:2021cv00562
Plaintiff:
Titus Henderson
Defendant:
Capt. James Elsinger, William Swietawkoski, Dylan Radtke and others
Not Classified By Court:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
