Schulta, Thomas v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
Thomas Schulta |
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc. |
3:2021cv00239 |
April 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
William M Conley |
Stephen L Crocker |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. C. R. Bard, Inc. served on 5/28/2021, answer due 6/18/2021. (lak) |
Filing 5 Affidavit of Service by Plaintiff. Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. served on 5/28/2021, answer due 6/18/2021. (lak) |
Filing 4 Disregard. Modified on 6/2/2021. (lak) |
Filing 3 Disregard. Modified on 6/2/2021. (lak) |
Action Requested: Counsel for plaintiff requested to promptly file proof of service. (kwf) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc. (kwf) |
Case non-randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. See related cases. (kwf) |
Standard attachments for District Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: # NORTC, #Corporate Disclosure Statement. (kwf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0758-2856279.), filed by Thomas Schulta. (Attachments: #1 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons) (Arbon, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.