Cases 1 - 10 of 677
Doe 1 et al v. Utah Valley University et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Defendant:
Utah Valley University and Derrick Pickering
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Reed et al v. Ascension Health et al
as 4:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Joshua Reed and Anthony Acuna
Defendant:
Shawnna Yost and Ascension Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Watson v. Elsaden
as 1:2024cv02302
Plaintiff:
Brian Watson
Defendant:
Laura Elsaden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Nelson v. Pehrson et al
as 2:2024cv00568
Defendant:
Austin Majors, Larry Majors, Ashley Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Shaw v. Howell
as 2:2024cv02300
Plaintiff:
Norman Shaw, Jr.
Defendant:
Chris Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Lichfield v. Kubler et al
as 2:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Narvin Lichfield
Defendant:
Katherine Kubler and Netflix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
McGann v. Gorman
as 1:2024cv01750
Plaintiff:
Sherry McGann
Defendant:
Geoffrey Gorman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 as - Fed. Question - Assault, Libel, Slander
Doe v. Tysk
as 1:2024cv01720
Counter-Defendant:
Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Joseph G. Tysk
Counter-Claimant:
Joseph G. Tysk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bruner v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2024cv00582
Defendant:
Sheryl Acevedo, Teslyn Hall, Oklahoma State of and others
Plaintiff:
Jamele Rashawn Bruner
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Smith v. Engman
as 1:2024cv00112
Defendant:
William Engman
Plaintiff:
Oliver D Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
