Cases 41 - 50 of 441,098
Greenhill v. Social Security
as 2:2024cv04381
Plaintiff:
Sonya Greenhill
Defendant:
Commisioner Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Mazariegos v. Kang Lu USA Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv04359
Plaintiff:
Sergio Christopher Galicia Mazariegos
Defendant:
Kang Lu USA Corp., Kang Yue USA Corp., Johnson Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Simmonds v. Upstate Correctional Facility
as 1:2023cv08325
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Desantis v. Covidien LP
as 2:2024cv04377
Plaintiff:
Anthony Desantis
Defendant:
Covidien LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harris v. Target Corporation
as 2:2024cv04383
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Harris
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Davydov et al v. Midforest Partnership et al
as 1:2024cv04390
Plaintiff:
Albert Davydov and Joshua L. Muss
Defendant:
Midforest Partnership, Michael Kostron, Kew Forest Property Management and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Marhyan v. Laffey Fine Homes of New York, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04389
Plaintiff:
Michael Marhyan
Defendant:
Laffey Fine Homes of New York, LLC, Mark Laffey, Phillip Laffey and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Duplessy v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04370
Plaintiff:
Sergot Duplessy
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
