Cases 41 - 50 of 3,427
Mitchell v. Gregory
as 3:2024cv00930
Plaintiff:
Fredd B. Mitchell
Defendant:
Dennis A. Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Parker
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Unknown IDOC Directors, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plumlee v. Drew
as 3:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
Robert L Plumlee, II
Defendant:
Jason Drew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Kareem Davenport
Defendant:
Sergeant Baker, C/O Suhro, C/O Schweizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Shan Crump
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coley v. Sandhu et al
as 3:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Kerry Coley
Defendant:
Dentist Sandhu, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and Vinyard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
J.C. Bryant, III
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Pulaski County Dentention Center, Pulaski County Dentention Center Medical Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Demetrius H. Nichols
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Dr. Garcia, K Osmundon and others
Petitioner:
Jeffrey J. Neslund and Michael D. Robbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ausby v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Emerald Ausby
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Anthony Wills, Tonya Knust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFadden v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Lavarius McFadden
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Anthony Willis, Tonya Knust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
