Cases 21 - 30 of 167
United States of America et al v. Abbott et al
as 5:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Michael Paul
Defendant:
Greg Abbott and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America et al v. Mr Cooper Group Inc
as 3:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Ex Rel Danielle Duncan
Defendant:
Mr Cooper Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. Winters
as 1:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher Winters
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
McKenzie v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Lewis Brooks McKenzie
Defendant:
State of Texas, Holly Hayes and Kelli Marie McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Murray v. River Hills CHM LLC
as 5:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Murray Meagan and Meagan Murray
Defendant:
River Hills CHM LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Mackintosh v. Apple, Inc
as 1:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Adam John Mackintosh
Defendant:
Apple, Inc, Josef Acebedo, Uber Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
United States of America v. Veal
as 4:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Ronald Veal
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Gale v. Mission Hospice of San Antonio, LLC.
as 5:2022cv01329
Plaintiff:
Melissa Gale
Defendant:
Mission Hospice of San Antonio, LLC. and Mission Hospice of San Antonio, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Peterson v. Pear Therapeutics, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Peterson
Defendant:
Pear Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Walker v. Walker et al
as 4:2022cv04175
Plaintiff:
Desiree Walker
Defendant:
Nathan Walker and Paradise Cemetery
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
