Cases 31 - 40 of 7,258
Woodard v. Illinois
as 3:2024cv01251
Petitioner:
Anthony Thomas Dewayne Woodard and Anthony D Woodard
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03704
Petitioner:
Andre King
Respondent:
of America United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Seger v. People of the State et al
as 3:2024cv01226
Petitioner:
Logan S. Seger
Respondent:
People of the State, Department of Human Services and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Graham v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01224
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01225
Petitioner:
Ronald Jermaine Jackson
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baldwin v. Crow et al
as 1:2024cv03626
Petitioner:
Derrick Anthony Angelos Baldwin
Respondent:
Christel Crow, Kimberly Hvarre and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marquez v. USA
as 3:2024cv01218
Petitioner:
Oscar Marquez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Swanson v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01176
Petitioner:
Benjamin Godwin Swanson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Patrick v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv50165
Petitioner:
Lonzo Patrick
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Luedtke v. Lilliard
as 3:2024cv01197
Petitioner:
James Luedtke
Respondent:
T Lilliard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.