Cases 11 - 20 of 3,686
Weiskircher v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2024cv00405
Defendant:
Brad Little, Josh Tewalt, Dax Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea May Weiskircher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marsalis v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00403
Respondent:
Josh Tewalt
Petitioner:
Jeffrey J. Marsalis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Paralegal Leeflang et al
as 1:2024cv00272
Defendant:
LT Segadelli, Paralegal Leeflang, Sandi Frelly and others
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wheiler et al
as 1:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Paralegal Leeflang, D.W. Martinez, A. Hottinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. A. Hottinger
as 1:2024cv00402
Defendant:
A. Hottinger
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Musgrove v. Parole Board Commission of Idaho et al
as 1:2024cv00394
Defendant:
Millisa Windrow, Raul Labrador, Shelley W. Armstrong and others
Petitioner:
Theodore E Musgrove
Respondent:
Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leischner v. Coeur D'Alene County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 2:2024cv00395
Defendant:
Coeur D'Alene County Sheriff's Office, Jeff Nye, Robert B Norris and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Russell Leischner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reno v. Gump et al
as 3:2024cv00392
Defendant:
Ryan O'Toole, Bryant Gump and Daniel Leavitt
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Reno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Douglas v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00391
Respondent:
Tyrell Davis
Petitioner:
John C. Douglas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charboneau v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00390
Respondent:
Tyrel Davis
Petitioner:
Jaime Dean Charboneau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
