Cases 11 - 20 of 10,881
Nichols v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00585
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jade Christian Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Nichols v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00586
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jade Christian Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Alexander v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00587
Defendant:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Saantyya Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Long v. Sweat
as 6:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
Natasha Nicole Long
Respondent:
Christe Sweat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shepard v. Quick et al
as 5:2024cv00578
Petitioner:
Byron James Shepard
Respondent:
Christe Quick and Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jones v. Stephens County Jail
as 5:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Dominic R Jones
Defendant:
Stephens County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liles v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00563
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Dylan Michael Liles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Liu v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00571
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Shaorong Liu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hudson v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00561
Petitioner:
Roy Hudson
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Rankins et al
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner:
Patrick Henry Hill, II
Respondent:
William C Rankins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
