Cases 1 - 10 of 10,047
Anderson Podiatry Center, P.C. et al v. BIEGLER GmbH
as 1:2024cv01603
Plaintiff:
Anderson Podiatry Center, P.C. and Dr. James Anderson
Defendant:
BIEGLER GmbH and SOLACE ADVANCEMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Miller et al v. City and County of Denver
as 1:2024cv01592
Plaintiff:
Antonio Miller and Penthouse Enterprise, LLC
Defendant:
City and County of Denver
P.C. v. D FORT HOTEL, LLC.
as 1:2024cv01584
Plaintiff:
P.C.
Defendant:
D FORT HOTEL, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Vigil et al
as 1:2024cv01582
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Cory Vigil and Boosted LLC a Colorado limited liability company doing business as Boosted E-Juice doing business as Boosted doing business as Live Boosted
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 331 Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act
Scofield v. Debt USA LLC
as 1:2024cv01554
Plaintiff:
Shane Scofield
Defendant:
Debt USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
C.J. v. Santosa and Brother Inc.
as 1:2024cv01548
Plaintiff:
C.J.
Defendant:
SANTOSA AND BROTHER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Harris v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01508
Plaintiff:
Colton John Harris
Defendant:
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
USA v. Union Carbide Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv01463
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corp. and Umetco Minerals Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
