Cases 41 - 50 of 349
USA v. Lori Carver
as 22-13608
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
LORI L. CARVER
Defendant / Appellee:
CASTLE MEDICAL, LLC
Corea v. ENT AND ALLERGY ASSOCIATES OF FLORIDA, LLC, et al
as 0:2022cv61929
Plaintiff:
Maria Corea
Defendant:
ENT AND ALERGY ASSOCIATES OF FLORIDA, LLC,, Maria Kahl, TR ROYAL PALM CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Rodriguez-Cruz v. Guerra
as 1:2022cv23049
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez-Cruz
Defendant:
Nelly Guerra
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
v. Advent Health Orlando et al
as 6:2022cv01515
Defendant:
Advent Health Orlando and John Scott Conover
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
USA v. Robert Bechtold, et al
as 22-12746
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
ROBERT BECHTOLD and PAMELA BECHTOLD
Davis v. Mother's Love Hospice LLC
as 1:2022cv03078
Plaintiff:
John Michael Davis
Defendant:
Mother's Love Hospice LLC doing business as Trinity Hospice Care of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Crosby v. SequelCare of Florida, LLC
as 8:2022cv01495
Plaintiff:
Marlena Crosby
Defendant:
SequelCare of Florida, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Atanda v. Rural Health Network of Monroe County, Florida, Inc.
as 1:2022cv21762
Plaintiff:
Olamide Osundolu Atanda
Defendant:
Rural Health Network of Monroe County, Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Mayfield v. McHugh et al
as 2:2022cv14205
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mayfield
Defendant:
Judge Elizabeth McHugh, Judge Leitha Dawn Mullens, Norman D. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BECHTOLD ET AL
as 3:2022cv06106
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
ROBERT BECHTOLD and PAMELA BECHTOLD
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
