Cases 71 - 80 of 6,916
BRAXTON v. ROPER
as 1:2023cv03018
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
CPL. ROPER and ROPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAXTON v. CLARKE
as 1:2023cv03024
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
NICOLE LESLIE CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GELIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02855
Plaintiff:
EDSON GELIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
HEMPHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02865
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL ANTIONE HEMPHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, JULIAN CASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITHAVAYANI v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2023cv02764
Plaintiff:
ANWAR MITHAVAYANI
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
NELSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv02753
Plaintiff:
JAMES NELSON
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. JOE BIDEN
as 1:2023cv02740
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02741
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02739
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02704
Petitioner:
BRIAN MOORE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
