Cases 1 - 10 of 8,380
PARKER v. USA
as 1:2024cv02685
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
BENNIE ALVIN PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PARKER v. USA
as 1:2024cv02686
Petitioner:
SANDRA RUTH PARKER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
KLEIN v. USA
as 1:2024cv02610
Petitioner:
FEDERICO GUILLERMO KLEIN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LORENZANA-CORDON v. LAMMER
as 1:2024cv02471
Respondent:
LAMMER
Petitioner:
ELIU ELIXANDER LORENZANA-CORDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KOVACIK v. USA
as 1:2024cv02433
Petitioner:
PAUL KOVACIK
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv02399
Plaintiff:
BILLY RAY SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FOSTER v. VICK
as 1:2024cv01897
Petitioner:
KEVIN ELLIOTT FOSTER
Respondent:
KELLY VICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BALL v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL et al
as 1:2024cv02365
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY-OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B. BALL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ACHEY v. U.S. DOJ EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS
as 1:2024cv02373
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PAUL ACHEY
Defendant:
U.S. DOJ EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SULLIVAN v. USA
as 1:2024cv02320
Petitioner:
JOHN EARLE SULLIVAN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
