Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 24-1995
Plaintiff:
GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 24-1992
Plaintiff:
GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 24-1993
Plaintiff:
GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 24-1994
Plaintiff:
GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Calderon Lopez v. US
as 24-1947
Plaintiff:
RICARDO J. CALDERON LOPEZ, dba Starlight Consulting Services
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
NVLSP v. US
as 24-1757
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER and ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Appellant:
ERIC ALAN ISAACSON
Chijioke-Uche v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
as 24-1254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY SOLOMON K. CHIJIOKE-UCHE and JEFFREY SOLOMON CHIJIOKE-UCHE
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., dba GM Financial
Chijioke-Uche v. General Motors
as 24-1255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY SOLOMON K. CHIJIOKE-UCHE and JEFFREY SOLOMON CHIJIOKE-UCHE
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS, aka GM Buick
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
BPI Sports, LLC v. ThermoLife International LLC
as 23-1625
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BPI SPORTS, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
THERMOLIFE INTERNATIONAL LLC, MUSCLE BEACH NUTRITION LLC and RONALD L. KRAMER
Manuel v. US
as 23-1388
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID ROWLAND MANUEL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
