Cases 51 - 60 of 2,416
Pitts Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Pitts Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Dorsey Intermodal
Defendant:
United States
Intervenor:
Coalition of American Chassis Manufacturers
Zhejiang Jingli Bearing Technology Co., Ltd. v. United States
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Zhejiang Jingli Bearing Technology Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
United States
Hoshine Silicon (Jia Xing) Industry Co., Ltd. v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Hoshine Silicon (Jia Xing) Industry Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
United States, Department of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Home Depot USA Inc. v. United States
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Home Depot USA Inc. and Home Depot USA, Inc.
Defendant:
United States
CME Acquisitions, LLC v. United States
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
CME Acquisitions, LLC
Defendant:
United States
Intervenor:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC and North American Stainless
ArcelorMittal Tubular Products et al v. United States
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
ArcelorMittal Tubular Products, Michigan Seamless Tube, LLC, Webco Industries, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States
Intervenor:
Dalmine S.p.A.
Innolux Corporation v. United States
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Innolux Corporation
Defendant:
United States
Bio-Lab, Inc. et al v. United States
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Biolab, Inc., Innovative Water Care LLC, Occidental Chemical Corporation and others
Defendant:
United States
Intervenor:
Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd. and Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd.
Shanghai Tainai Bearing Co., Ltd. et al v. United States
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Shanghai Tainai Bearing Co., Ltd. and C&U Americas, LLC
Defendant:
United States
CVB Inc. v. United States
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
CVB Inc.
Defendant:
United States
Intervenor:
Zinus, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
