Cases 41 - 50 of 34,834
Badger v. City of Cortland
as 24-1644
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. BADGER, MARCUS A. BENJAMIN, SEAN P. BYRNES and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CORTLAND
Cid Monroy v. Garland
as 24-1641
Petitioner:
ELDER ORLA DEL CID MONROY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
County of Westchester v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 24-1639
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, TIOGA COUNTY, CATTARAUGUS COUNTY, NY and others
Defendant:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC., OPTUMRX INC. and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Roberts v. CVS
as 24-1635
Plaintiff:
JAZMINE I. ROBERTS
Defendant:
CVS HEALTH CORPORATION and YUSHAN LIU
Morocho-Andilema v. Garland
as 24-1642
Petitioner:
SAMUEL RAIMUADO MOROCHO-ANDILEMA, ESTEFANIA CECILIA BUNAY-TENEMAZA and LIAM JARED MOROCHO-BUNAY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ball v. Criminal Investigations Department
as 24-1638
Plaintiff:
DENYALL BALL
Defendant:
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS DEPARTMENT and WATERTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT
St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center v. American Anesthesiology of Syracuse, P.C.
as 24-1643
Not Yet Classified:
ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER, AMERICAN ANESTHESIOLOGY OF SYRACUSE, P.C., AMERICAN ANESTHESIOLOGY, INC. and others
Zavala-Gutierrez v. Garland
as 24-1624
Petitioner:
ZULEMA ZAVALA-GUTIERREZ, CRISTHOFFER ADONIS MADRID-ZAVALA and WILLIAM MADRID-ZAVALA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Amelio v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 24-1619
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO AMELIO, CARMINE AMELIO and CLEMENTE AMELIO
Defendant:
QUICKEN LOANS, INC., FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, MCABE, WESIBURG & CONWAY, P.C. and others
Daquilema-Marcatoma v. Garland
as 24-1630
Petitioner:
JORGE EFRAIN DAQUILEMA-MARCATOMA, MARIA JUANA YAMBA-CISLEMA and NURY PRISCILA DAQUILEMA-YAMBAY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
