Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 121 - 130 of 53,523
United States of America v. Thompson
as 24-1513
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MARLON THOMPSON
Mar-Can Transportation Company, Inc. v. Local 854 Pension Fund
as 24-1512
Not Yet Classified: MAR-CAN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC. and LOCAL 854 PENSION FUND
Intervenor: DEMOS P. DEMOPOULOS, STEPHEN MALONEY and MICHAEL SPINELLI
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Alexandre
as 24-1493
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION and ABC
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: EDDY ALEXANDRE, DEF and EMINIFX INC.
Receiver: DAVID A CASTLEMAN, Temporary Receiver, as Court-Appointed Receiver
The People of the State of New York v. Arm or Ally, LLC
as 24-1497
Petitioner: ARM OR ALLY, LLC, BLACKHAWK MANUFACTURING GROUP, INC., AKA 80 PERCENT ARMS, INC., AKA 80 PERCENT ARMS, SALVO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.., AKA 80P BUILDER, AKA 80P FREEDOM CO. and others
Respondent: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Celli v. United States of America
as 24-1490
Petitioner: LUCIO CELLI
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McGrady v. Montgomery County, Maryland
as 24-1491
Plaintiff: DUANE MCGRADY
Defendant: MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, STATE OF MARYLAND, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF and others
United States of America v. Modile
as 24-1494
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOSEPH MODILE
Diakhate v. Searls
as 24-1492
Petitioner: CHEIKH LOUIS DIAKHATE
Respondent: JEFFREY SEARLS, Facility Director of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
United States of America v. Cook
as 24-1496
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: FRANKIE COOK and SHAWNTEE ELLISON
Vogel v. Boris
as 24-1498
Not Yet Classified: STEPHEN A. VOGEL, DAVID BORIS and MARSHALL KIEV

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?