Cases 211 - 220 of 30,001
Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Bobby Stewart
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Bernell Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Santiago v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03732
Plaintiff:
Emilse Santiago
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Abbott Hook v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Ian J. Abbott Hook
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Estes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brian Estes
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ranaghan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03538
Plaintiff:
Mark Ranaghan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sproul v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06307
Plaintiff:
Christy Lynn Sproul
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
O'Brien v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Kaliegh O'Brien
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Scullark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03721
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Scullark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Perez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03744
Plaintiff:
Justina Valerio Perez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
