Cases 151 - 160 of 1,214
Smail Imports Inc, et al v. RMJ Motors Inc, et al
as 21-2605
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SMAIL IMPORTS INC and LMJ II INC
Defendant / Appellee:
RMJ MOTORS INC, NR REALITY 4 LLC, HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA and others
Saket Chaudhari, et al v. Matthew Parker, et al
as 21-1337
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW PARKER and PARKER CONSULTING SERVICES INC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SATYENDRA CHAUDHARI and SAKET CHAUDHARI
Edward Salevsky, et al v. Seneca Resources Co LLC
as 22-2339
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD J. SALEVSKY, ADRIAN M. CARLIN-SALEVSKY and SALEVESKY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant / Appellee:
SENECA RESOURCES CO LLC
Perlberger Law Associates, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 22-2333
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PERLBERGER LAW ASSOCIATES and HANNA PERLBERGER
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
Kirk Eady v. Tapfury LLC, et al
as 22-2061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIRK EADY
Defendant / Appellee:
TAPFURY LLC, TAPFURY INC, PRANKDIAK LLC and others
David Kivett v. Neolpharma Inc, et al
as 22-1994
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID KIVETT
Defendant / Appellant:
NEOLPHARMA INC
Defendant / Appellee:
CEDIPROF INC and NEOLPHARMA INTERNATIONAL SA DE CV
David Kivett v. Neolpharma Inc, et al
as 22-2083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID KIVETT
Defendant / Appellee:
NEOLPHARMA INC
Defendant:
CEDIPROF INC and NEOLPHARMA INTERNATIONAL SA DE CV
Robson Forensic Inc v. Anthony Shinsky, et al
as 22-1961
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBSON FORENSIC INC
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY J. SHINSKY and EXIGENT GLOBAL INC
Anthony Martino v. David Mazie, et al
as 22-2019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY MARTINO, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID A. MAZIE, Esq., ADAM M. SLATER, Esq. and MAZIE SLATER KATZ AND FREEMAN, LLC, hereinafter "Mazie Slater"
Barry Cohen v. Jeff Horn, et al
as 22-2148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRY COHEN
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF J. HORN and HORN LAW GROUP LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
