Cases 61 - 70 of 135
Drake et al v. United States Enrichment Corporation, Inc.
as 5:2013cv00223
Plaintiff:
Bryan L. Drake , Angela N. Allison , James Robert Bone and others
Defendant:
United States Enrichment Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wise v. Siemens Industry, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01183
Plaintiff:
Richard Wise
Defendant:
Siemens Industry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fair et al v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00932
Plaintiff:
Frederick S. Fair, Sr. and Ronnie L. Goode
Defendant:
Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brooks v. Fire Mountain Restaurants LLC
as 4:2013cv00089
Plaintiff:
Sherry Brooks
Defendant:
Fire Mountain Restaurants LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Oliver v. White Lodging Service Corporation
as 3:2013cv00676
Plaintiff:
Brandon Oliver
Defendant:
White Lodging Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Porter v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jason Porter
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Probus v. Southwire Company
as 4:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
Christy Probus
Defendant:
Southwire Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tomassi v. MDS, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00201
Plaintiff:
Ray A. Tomassi
Defendant:
MDS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Ramirez v. Bolster & Jeffries Health Care Group, LLC
as 1:2012cv00205
Plaintiff:
Malana Sneed Ramirez
Defendant:
Bolster & Jeffries Health Care Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Massey et al v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC
as 3:2012cv00656
Plaintiff:
Davonne Massey and Tirana Dishman
Defendant:
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
