Cases 81 - 90 of 29,607
Abrell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03554
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Danny Abrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
INGRAM et al v. E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company et al
as 2:2024cv03559
Defendant:
The Chemours Company and E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA INGRAM and JEFFREY INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Little v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03561
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Little
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cobb v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03565
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronnie C. Cobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pearson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03562
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Diana Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rochester v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03542
Plaintiff:
Alvin Rochester
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simcox v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03556
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christine Simcox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Manfre v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03493
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kevin Manfre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ventarola v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03504
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Ventarola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Craft v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03507
Plaintiff:
Tammy S. Craft
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
