Cases 1 - 10 of 29,531
Pearson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03562
Plaintiff:
Diana Pearson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rochester v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03542
Plaintiff:
Alvin Rochester
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simcox v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03556
Plaintiff:
Christine Simcox
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fialkowski v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03546
Plaintiff:
Evangeline Fialkowski
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henry v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03548
Plaintiff:
James Henry
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hepfer v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03543
Plaintiff:
Steven Hepfer
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
INGRAM et al v. E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company et al
as 2:2024cv03559
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY INGRAM and CHRISTINA INGRAM
Defendant:
E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Aneweer v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03544
Plaintiff:
Daniel Aneweer
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abrell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03554
Plaintiff:
Danny Abrell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cobb v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03565
Plaintiff:
Ronnie C. Cobb
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
