Cases 101 - 110 of 3,645
Dunlap v. Andrus et al
as 1:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allan Dunlap
Defendant:
Cecil D Andrus and Raul Labradour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpentier v. State of Idaho
as 1:2023cv00535
Petitioner:
Alfred L. Carpentier
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corral v. State of Idaho
as 1:2023cv00548
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Astroga Corral
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkins v. Clifford, et al.
as 1:2023cv00523
Petitioner:
Robert Wilkins
Respondent:
Ada County Sheriff Matthew Clifford, Attorney General Raul R. Labrador and Steve Wolfson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bowman, et al. v. Diaz, et al.
as 1:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
Justin Bowman, Avorie Rodriguez and Kenneth Terry
Defendant:
Officer Octavio Diaz, Officer Tyler Shropshire, Officer Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Aldrich
as 2:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Chadwin King
Defendant:
Clinton Aldrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milton v. Valley
as 1:2023cv00520
Petitioner:
Bishop Patrick Michael Milton
Defendant:
Randy Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kiser v. Elmore County Sheriff's Department, et al.
as 4:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kiser
Defendant:
Elmore County Sheriff's Department and Idaho Dept of Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Storm v. McClusky et al
as 1:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Rick Storm and Rickie Storm
Defendant:
David McClusky, Dodds Hayden, Karen Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Valley et al
as 1:2023cv00500
Petitioner:
Devon Joseph Anderson
Respondent:
Randy Valley and Raul Labrador
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
