Cases 41 - 50 of 85,547
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01987
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kyle McCune v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2024cv07890
Plaintiff:
Kyle MCCune
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lapreisha Bush et al v. San Bernardino County Children and Family Services et al
as 5:2024cv01977
Defendant:
San Bernardino County Children and Family Services, Cindy Reyes, Johnathan Millard and others
Plaintiff:
Lapreisha Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Maya U. Lee et al v. Merrick B. Garland et al
as 2:2024cv07898
Plaintiff:
Maya U. Lee and Yehezkiel A. Hamzah
Defendant:
Terri Robinson, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
v. Arnoff et al
as 8:2024cv01995
Defendant:
Michelle Adams, Susie Abboud, Constance Adler Galloway and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Epson America, Inc. v. Graesen Arnoff et al
as 8:2024cv01996
Defendant:
Steve Aardappel, Mary Abegg Sanchez, Sandra Abernathy and others
Plaintiff:
Epson America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Randi M. Mazzara v. Union Pacific Railroad et al
as 8:2024cv01990
Respondent:
National Mediation Board, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, Arbitrator Edwin Benn and others
Petitioner:
Randi M. Mazzara
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Luke Skywalker et al v. County of Jackson
as 2:2024cv07948
Defendant:
County of Jackson
Plaintiff:
Luke Skywalker and David Christopher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Devin Wade v. Secretary of Defense
as 5:2024cv01973
Plaintiff:
Devin Wade
Defendant:
Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
