Cases 71 - 80 of 2,074
Beverly v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv05695
Plaintiff:
Francois Rene Beverly
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Eaden v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv05705
Plaintiff:
Teri L. Eaden
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gray v. Social Security
as 4:2023cv06722
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dereke Gray
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
v. Gray
as 4:2023cv06721
Defendant:
Mr. Dereke Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Gerold v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv06617
Plaintiff:
Laura Adriana Gerold
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Oliveira v. O'Malley
as 4:2023cv06564
Plaintiff:
Charles Oliveira
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wimbley v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv06189
Plaintiff:
Danny Wimbley
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Commissioner of Social Security, Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Osbaldeston v. Kijakazi et al
as 3:2023cv06272
Plaintiff:
Ashley Osbaldeston
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Torres v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv06321
Plaintiff:
Magdalena Torres
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Stevens v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv06289
Plaintiff:
Lora J Stevens
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
