Cases 1 - 10 of 11,737
Corey Sipkin Photography LLC v. What Pros Wear, Inc.
as 3:2024cv06612
Plaintiff:
Corey Sipkin Photography LLC
Defendant:
What Pros Wear, Inc. doing business as What Pros Wear
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Lee v. RebelsMarket, Inc.
as 5:2024cv06609
Plaintiff:
Jackson Lee
Defendant:
RebelsMarket, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Oppenheimer v. Association
as 3:2024cv06579
Defendant:
Northern California Golf Association
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Viral DRM LLC v. Tyeson et al
as 3:2024cv06597
Plaintiff:
Viral DRM LLC
Defendant:
Network Ten Pty Ltd and Cameron Tyeson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Viral DRM LLC v. Dominguez et al
as 3:2024cv06598
Plaintiff:
Viral DRM LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Salvador Aguila Dominguez and El Universal Compania Periodistica Nacional, S.A. DE C.V.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Viral DRM LLC v. Dubois et al
as 5:2024cv06586
Plaintiff:
Viral DRM LLC
Defendant:
Francois Dubois and TF1
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Netgear Inc., v. Electronics Central21 LLC
as 5:2024cv06595
Defendant:
Electronics Central21 LLC
Plaintiff:
Netgear Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Viral DRM LLC v. Rodrigues et al
as 5:2024cv06600
Defendant:
Poder360 Jornalismo and Jose Fernando Rodrigues
Plaintiff:
Viral DRM LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Liu v. Chen et al
as 3:2024cv06578
Defendant:
Shenzhenshiyixindianziyouxiangongsi and Longyan Chen
Plaintiff:
Songhua Liu
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Duffy Archive Limited v. Insight Editions, L.P.
as 3:2024cv06554
Plaintiff:
Duffy Archive Limited
Defendant:
Insight Editions, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
