Cases 61 - 70 of 125
Villegas v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2012cv00971
Plaintiff:
Ramon Villegas
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , Reconstruct Company and DOES 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Thomas Chayra v. 7-Eleven Inc
as 3:2012cv00559
Plaintiff:
Thomas Chayra
Defendant:
Cardtronics, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Heston v. Comptroller of the Currency et al
as 3:2012cv00222
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey G. Heston
Defendant:
Comptroller of the Currency and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pastrana v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2012cv00174
Plaintiff:
Adela Pastrana
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP , Reconstrust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vance v. Cardtronics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00015
Plaintiff:
Tamara Vance
Defendant:
Cardtronics, Inc. and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mabary v. Cardtronics USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv03056
Plaintiff:
Lisa Mabary
Defendant:
Cardtronics USA Inc and Cardtronics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norris v. Cardtronics USA, Inc.
as 3:2011cv02813
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Louise Norris
Defendant:
Cardtronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Pedery-Edwards v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 3:2011cv02765
Plaintiff:
Judith Pedery-Edwards
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank , Federal National Mortgage Association and DOES 1 to 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Valle v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association Successors In Interest To Washington Mutual et al
as 3:2011cv02453
Plaintiff:
Elda R Valle
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association Successors In Interest To Washington Mutual , California Reconveyance Company and Does 1 through 50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Wunch v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 3:2011cv02407
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Wunch
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank , California Reconveyance Company and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
