Cases 41 - 50 of 1,315
Kidd v. Wawa, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00694
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS KIDD
Defendant:
WAWA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Sprankle v. Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv02285
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Sprankle and Christopher L. Sprankle
Defendant:
Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc., Embraer Aircraft Holding, Inc., Embraer Aircraft Customer Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Turner v. Ensurem II LLC
as 8:2023cv02673
Plaintiff:
Raoul Turner
Defendant:
Ensurem LLC and Ensurem II LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Hudson-Reeves v. New York Pizza & Pasta, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01058
Plaintiff:
Colleen Hudson-Reeves
Defendant:
New York Pizza & Pasta, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Montgomery v. Pasco County School Board
as 8:2023cv02601
Plaintiff:
Donielle Montgomery
Defendant:
Pasco County School Board
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Cavaliere v. Florida Power and Light Company
as 2:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Kyle Cavaliere
Defendant:
Florida Power and Light Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Saccaro v. Verizon Connect Telo Inc
as 8:2023cv02531
Plaintiff:
Terrence Saccaro
Defendant:
Verizon Connect Telo Inc and Verizon Corporate Resources Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Reed v. Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC
as 6:2023cv02126
Plaintiff:
Earl Reed
Defendant:
Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Brice v. ADT, LLC
as 3:2023cv01279
Plaintiff:
RHONDA BRICE
Defendant:
ADT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Fredrick v. GEICO
as 8:2023cv02417
Plaintiff:
HEIDI B FREDRICK and Heidi B. Fredrick
Defendant:
GEICO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
