Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Wagner v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2014cv03131
Plaintiff:
Peter Wagner
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Warren Ribley, Bridget Devlin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Goldsberry v. A Caring Touch of McLean County, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01134
Plaintiff:
Florence K Goldsberry
Defendant:
A Caring Touch of McLean County, Inc., John Werderits and Wendy Werderits
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadnax v. McHugh et al
as 4:2014cv04029
Plaintiff:
Anthony Broadnax
Defendant:
John McHugh, Terry Brewer and Carl W. Stingley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Wynne v. Thyssenkrupp Presta Danville LLC
as 2:2014cv02010
Plaintiff:
James B Wynne
Defendant:
Thyssenkrupp Presta Danville LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Olvera-Mundt v. Rock Island Integrated Services et al
as 4:2013cv04097
Plaintiff:
Deana E Olvera-Mundt
Defendant:
Douglas L Leyendecker and Rock Island Integrated Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Smith v. Presence Hospitals PRV
as 2:2013cv02197
Plaintiff:
Michelle D Smith
Defendant:
Presence Hospitals PRV
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
DeBacker v. City of Moline et al
as 4:2013cv04062
Plaintiff:
Michael E. DeBacker
Defendant:
City of Moline and Jay Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Murray v. GCA Services Group of Texas, L.P.
as 1:2013cv01255
Plaintiff:
Wendi Murray
Defendant:
GCA Services Group of Texas, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
v. Murray et al
as 1:2013cv01254
Defendant:
Wendi Murray and GCA Services Group of Texas, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Planitz v. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv03035
Plaintiff:
Andrew J Planitz
Defendant:
Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. , Robert Wolf and Amy Quigg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
