Cases 81 - 90 of 37,451
Bornstein et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04425
Plaintiff:
Galyna Bornstein and Jeffrey Bornstein
Defendant:
Alejandro N Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Asher v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv04431
Plaintiff:
Zareen Asher
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. the United States Mail package bearing tracking number 9534 6159 0109 4142 8417 14, further described in Attachment A
as 1:2024mc00430
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
the United States Mail package bearing tracking number 9534 6159 0109 4142 8417 14, further described in Attachment A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Droppleman et al v. Droppleman
as 1:2024cv04362
Plaintiff:
Patrick Droppleman and John Michael Droppleman
Defendant:
Denise Droppleman
Doe et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv04324
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Defendant:
MERRICK B GARLAND, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rojas v. Barnes et al
as 1:2024cv04381
Defendant:
J. Mandella Barnes, Mandela Barnes, Mandela Barnes for Wisconsin and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States of America v. In the Matter of the Search of: A cellular telephone,
as 1:2024mc00428
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
In the Matter of the Search of: A cellular telephone,
Mission Trading LLC v. Costanza
as 1:2024cv04311
Plaintiff:
Mission Trading LLC
Defendant:
Phyllis Costanza
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
