Cases 111 - 120 of 6,950
Borris v. Enterprise Technical Assistance Services, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00951
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Holmes v. Hamilton County, Ohio, Government
as 1:2024cv00053
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gavin Power, LLC v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Gavin Power, LLC
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan
Intervenor:
Sierra Club
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Doe (D.E.G.) v. Red Roof Inns, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04256
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (D.E.G.)
Defendant:
Red Roof Inns, Inc., RRF Holding Company, LLC, Red Roof Franchising, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
R.J. v. Adena Health System
as 2:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
R.J.
Defendant:
Adena Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schmidt v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Albert Schmidt
Defendant:
Caliber Home Loans, Inc. and Manley Deas & Kochalski, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Michigan Association of Public School Academies et al v. U.S. Department of Education et al
as 2:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Michigan Association of Public School Academies, Thomas B. Fordham Institute, Delaware Charter Schools Network and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Education, Secretary Miguel Cardona and Ruth E. Ryder
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hi-Vac Corporation et al v. Coley et al
as 2:2023cv04184
Plaintiff:
Hi-Vac Corporation and Alliance Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel J Coley, Matthew D Greenwold, Randy J DePuy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
