Cases 21 - 30 of 1,330
TREVOR v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2023cv04840
Plaintiff:
GREEN MUNIYR TREVOR
Defendant:
ALFRED C YOUNG, III and BARBARA A. YOUNG
ENTY v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2023cv04651
Plaintiff:
KYLE R. ENTY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., TANISHA BEY and KRISTEN ABNEY
PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY GROWTH, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 2:2023cv04587
Plaintiff:
PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY GROWTH, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, JACQUELINE STAGGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Petition to Quiet Ti
PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY GROWTH, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 2:2023cv04584
Plaintiff:
PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY GROWTH, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and JACQUELINE STAGGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Petition to Quiet Ti
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. JOHNSON
as 2:2023cv04497
Defendant:
TARANI A. JOHNSON and TARANI-ALIKE JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
AMERICAN LEGION POST #497 VETERANS, INC. v. CHELTENHAM SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2023cv04452
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN LEGION POST #497 VETERANS, INC.
Defendant:
CHELTENHAM SCHOOL DISTRICT and MONTGOMERY COUNTY PA SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE v. ROTO-ROOTER WATER RESTORATION PHI et al
as 2:2023cv04270
Plaintiff:
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Defendant:
ROTO-ROOTER WATER RESTORATION PHI and ADRIAN GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
MCGUIGAN v. UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 2:2023cv04258
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH P MCGUIGAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
