Cases 1 - 10 of 1,765
Mathis v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01128
Defendant:
Dr. Michael O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Louise Mathis
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Anderson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01112
Plaintiff:
Latoya Freeman and Latoya Anderson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Legge v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
Angela Legge
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Garrett v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01063
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Andrea L. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01036
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Anderson
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Carlton Lerosignal Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Traughber v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Crystal Dawn Traughber
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Haynie v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Haynie
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McClure v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
Steven A. McClure
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bly v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00957
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Plaintiff:
Teresa Lynn Bly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
