Cases 1 - 10 of 1,566
Verch v. ACM FATZ VII LLC
as 4:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Marco Verch
Defendant:
ACM FATZ VII LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Bee Creek Photography, LLC v. Bray Real Estate Group LLC
as 3:2024cv01331
Plaintiff:
Bee Creek Photography LLC
Defendant:
Bray Real Estate Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
BuDhaGirl LLC v. Bengbujunzilandianzishangwuyouxiangongsi et al
as 3:2024cv01299
Plaintiff:
BuDhaGirl LLC
Defendant:
Bengbujunzilandianzishangwuyouxiangongsi doing business as ZeeDix and Tingbao Zhou
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
BuDhaGirl LLC v. Shenzhen Jiexinwei Electronic Technology Co Ltd et al
as 3:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
BuDhaGirl LLC
Defendant:
Shenzhen Jiexinwei Electronic Technology Co Ltd doing business as YBMYCM Jewelry and Zhang Weixan
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01279
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01278
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01277
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Brandon Wade Photography, LLC v. OTC Bar LLC
as 3:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wade Photography LLC
Defendant:
OTC Bar LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Brandon Wade Photography LLC v. Theatro Labs Inc
as 3:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wade Photography LLC
Defendant:
Theatro Labs Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Verch v. Aurum Title LLC
as 3:2024cv01267
Plaintiff:
Marco Verch
Defendant:
Aurum Title LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
