Cases 61 - 70 of 1,202
Joswick v. Huntington Debt Holding et al
as 2:2022cv00565
Plaintiff:
Dale A Joswick
Defendant:
Huntington Debt Holding and Alliant Capital Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Saghatchi v. United States Department of State et al
as 2:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
SOGOL SAGHATCHI
Defendant:
United States Department of State, U.S. EMBASSY IN YEREVAN, REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA, ANTONY BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Hopkins v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hopkins
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
McKinsey & Company, Inc. v. Boyd, Christopher et al
as 3:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Christopher Boyd, Nathan Gordon, Stephanie Defoe-Haskins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Stauber v. Messerli & Kramer PA
as 1:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Stauber
Defendant:
Messerli & Kramer PA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Savata, Mehmet v. Edil, Banu
as 3:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Mehmet Fatih Savata
Respondent:
Banu Esin Edil
Kofler v. Midland Credit Management Inc
as 1:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Wendy Kofler
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Koepke v. Becerra et al
as 1:2022cv00114
Petitioner:
Mary Koepke
Respondent:
Xavier Becerra and Aetna Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chartier v. Midland Credit Management Inc
as 2:2021cv01440
Plaintiff:
Dale Chartier
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lim, Khor v. Tong, Goh et al
as 3:2021cv00781
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Goh Chok Tong, Barack Obama, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
