Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Netchoice, LLC v. Fitch
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Netchoice, LLC
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Fitch
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Fitch
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
The Mississippi Bar v. Russell
as 3:2024ad00001
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Rhett R. Russell
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Hopson v. Lauderdale County Sheriff Department
as 3:2023cv03144
Plaintiff:
Edward James Hopson
Defendant:
Lauderdale County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
The Mississippi Bar v. Hessler
as 3:2023ad00006
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Eric John Hessler
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Gunn
as 3:2023ad00005
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
William Corban Gunn
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC v. Board of Supervisors of Rankin County, Mississippi
as 3:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC doing business as AT&T Mississippi
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors of Rankin County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McPhail v. Lynchard
as 4:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Beau McPhail
Defendant:
Percy L. Lynchard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
The Mississippi Bar v. Sheppard
as 3:2023ad00004
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Felisha Anne Sheppard
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
