Cases 1 - 10 of 3,658
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00296
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00175
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
North Point RX, LLC v. Key Therapeutics, LLC
as 3:2024mc00554
Plaintiff:
North Point RX, LLC
Defendant:
Key Therapeutics, Inc. and Key Therapeutics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Emmerich Newspapers, Inc. et al v. Mississippi River Commission
as 5:2024cv00087
Defendant:
Mississippi River Commission
Plaintiff:
Howard Jones and Emmerich Newspapers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Huddleston v. Mississippi Department of Employment Security
as 1:2024cv00170
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Employment Security
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Huddleston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00531
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Strausbaugh v. USAF
as 1:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Stephen Strausbaugh
Defendant:
USAF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
The Mississippi Bar v. Woodberry
as 3:2024ad00005
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Whitney Dilmore and others
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Dexter Lamon Woodberry
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
The Mississippi Bar v. Rose
as 3:2024ad00004
Interested Party:
Whitney Dilmore, Porfi Stokes, Arthur Johnston and others
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Marquis Deshun Rose
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
