Cases 81 - 90 of 24,778
Lin et al v. Hyundai Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (U.S. Branch)
as 1:2024cv05829
Defendant:
Hyundai Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (U.S. Branch)
Plaintiff:
Jing Jing Lin and Yuan Li
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Journey Physical Therapy, PLLC v. WebPt, Inc.
as 6:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Journey Physical Therapy, PLLC
Defendant:
WebPt, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Livevideo.AI Corp v. Redstone et al
as 1:2024cv06290
Defendant:
Monica Seligman, Christine Varney, National Amusements Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Livevideo.AI Corp
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 021
Dourfaye et al v. Bank Of America Corporation
as 1:2024cv06279
Defendant:
Bank Of America Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kader Dourfaye and KD Establishment
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Logan Finance Corporation v. McLaughlin
as 2:2024cv05800
Defendant:
ASHLEY MCLAUGHLIN
Plaintiff:
LOGAN FINANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C. v. Urban Engineers, Inc.
as 1:2024cv06249
Plaintiff:
Urban Engineers of New York, D.P.C.
Defendant:
Urban Engineers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC. v. Adaptive Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2024cv05786
Defendant:
ADAPTIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. D/B/A QUICKPOUCH
Plaintiff:
MESO SCALE DIAGNOSTICS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Franklin Press, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Company
as 6:2024cv06508
Plaintiff:
Franklin Press, Inc.
Defendant:
Eastman Kodak Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Otrompke, JD v. Catholic Charities Alliance et al
as 1:2024cv05878
Defendant:
Catholic Charities Alliance, Archdiocese of New York, Richard Roe and others
Plaintiff:
John J Otrompke, JD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
