Cases 81 - 90 of 7,256
Brodeur v. USA Government et al
as 1:2024cv02062
Petitioner:
Christopher Xavier Brodeur
Respondent:
USA Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
D.W. v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 1:2024cv01870
Plaintiff:
D.W.
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission, Patricia K. Cushwa and Susan Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Phillips v. Edgcomb et al
as 1:2024cv01890
Petitioner:
Dezzan D Phillips
Respondent:
LaSalle County Jail and Jason Edgcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lambert v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2024cv01100
Petitioner:
Mario Lambert
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Blackwell v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00581
Petitioner:
Ryan D Blackwell
Respondent:
Richard Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Jones
as 1:2024cv01657
Petitioner:
Sr. Lawrence L Jackson
Respondent:
Illinois River Correctional Center and Chance Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Crowe
as 1:2024cv01089
Petitioner:
Cortez D Williams
Respondent:
Crystal Crowe
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ahrens v. Bennett
as 1:2024cv01084
Petitioner:
Cody Ahrens
Respondent:
Kimberly Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Buckhana v. Truitt
as 1:2024cv01427
Petitioner:
William D. Buckhana
Respondent:
Charles Truitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barry v. Lombardi
as 1:2024cv01415
Petitioner:
Marie Barry
Respondent:
Brandon Lombardi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
