Cases 161 - 170 of 229
DUNN v. USA
as 2:2007cv00140
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN DUNN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
BRAUNSTEIN v. HARRIS et al
as 2:2007cv00130
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BRAUNSTEIN
Defendant:
EUGENE HARRIS and PHYLLIS RYAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MCF COMMUNICATIONS BG INC v. MANCHESTER, MAINE, TOWN OF et al
as 1:2007cv00103
Plaintiff:
MCF COMMUNICATIONS BG INC
Defendant:
MANCHESTER, MAINE, TOWN OF , MANCHESTER PLANNING BOARD, TOWN OF , PATRICK GILBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
AIR & WATER QUALITY INC v CLYDE TARR et al
as 2:2007cv00123
Plaintiff:
AIR & WATER QUALITY INC
Defendant:
CLYDE TARR and RADON DONE RIGHT LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
BHATTA v. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, US SECRETARY
as 1:2007cv00085
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
DEEP v. BOIES et al
as 2:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
JOHN A DEEP
Defendant:
DAVID BOIES , BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP , STRAUS & BOIES LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BANGOR CELLULAR TELEPHONE LP et al
as 1:2007cv00041
Plaintiff:
BANGOR CELLULAR TELEPHONE LP
Defendant:
MILFORD, TOWN OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
CENTRAL MAINE MEDICAL CENTER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 2:2007cv00042
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL MAINE MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
HINKLEY v. AMERIQUEST FUNDING II REO LLC et al
as 2:2007cv00020
Plaintiff:
DIANA HINKLEY
Defendant:
AMERIQUEST FUNDING II REO LLC and AMC MORTGAGE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
GRASMUCK v. FIRST RESOLUTION MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
as 2:2006cv00237
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
