Cases 221 - 230 of 363
H. v. Milford School District
as 1:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
S. H.
Defendant:
Milford School District
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Milford-Bennington Railroad Co., Inc. et al v. Pan Am Railways, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00264
Defendant:
Boston and Maine Corporation, Pan Am Railways, Inc. and Springfield Terminal Railway Co.
Plaintiff:
Milford-Bennington Railroad Co., Inc. and Peter Leishman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brady v. Oyster River School District SAU #5
as 1:2010cv00173
Plaintiff:
Miles Brady
Defendant:
Oyster River Cooperative School District SAU #5
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Education: Handicapped Child Act
USA v. Colby
as 1:2010cv00168
Defendant:
Alan Colby
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
USA v. Crowe
as 1:2010cv00139
Respondent:
Richard Crowe
Petitioner:
USA
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
USA v. Crowe
as 1:2010cv00138
Respondent:
Maria Crowe
Petitioner:
USA
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
Wentworth-Douglass Hospital v. Young & Novis Professional Association
as 1:2010cv00120
Defendant:
Glenn H. Littell, Cheryl C. Moore and Young & Novis Professional Association
Plaintiff:
Wentworth-Douglass Hospital
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Leeds v. BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00108
Defendant:
BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
USA v. Rockhill
as 1:2010cv00098
Defendant:
Virginia Rockhill
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Glynn v. Impact Science & Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00088
Respondent:
CadQal Development, Inc. and Gloria Jacobson
Defendant:
EDO Corp. and Impact Science & Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dennis P. Glynn
Counter Defendant:
Saltwhistle Technology, LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
