Cases 51 - 60 of 35,885
(SS) Robles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Angelica Maria Robles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
David Duk Kim v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03889
Plaintiff:
David Duk Son Kim
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gilbert v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02735
Plaintiff:
Heather Marie Gilbert
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Walker v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
Skyler Robert Walker
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nathan Randall Beahn v. Martin O Malley
as 8:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Nathan Randall Beahn
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Randall v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02736
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Randall
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Miguel Gonzalo Jimenez v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03857
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL GONZALO JIMENEZ
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sharon Perry v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03781
Plaintiff:
Sharron Perry
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lerston Massengale v. Martin J. OMalley
as 2:2024cv03813
Plaintiff:
Lerston Massengale
Defendant:
Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
North v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv02732
Plaintiff:
Anthony Keith North
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
