Cases 111 - 120 of 60,240
Ponder v. Selhorst
as 2:2024cv03744
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Defendant:
James Selhorst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ponder v. Walker
as 2:2024cv03746
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Defendant:
Zachary A. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ponder v. Columbus Police Department
as 2:2024cv03747
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Defendant:
Columbus Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Power v. Rauen
as 1:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Zammron Power
Defendant:
Darcy Rauen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Chitison v. Hyundai Motor America
as 2:2024cv03740
Plaintiff:
Aaron P Chitison
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America, JOHN DOE 1 THROUGH 10 and XYZ Corporations #1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Tanzosh et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03737
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Florence Tanzosh and Vincent Marcantonio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kay v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03735
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R.Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William C. Kay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Greggs v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03736
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tiffaney Greggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rutt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03739
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Rutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Proper v. Indivior Incorporated et al
as 1:2024sf65701
Defendant:
Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Ltd., MonoSol LLC, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan J Proper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
