Cases 91 - 100 of 10,887
Downey v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Johnie D Downey
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Livingston v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Aaron J Livingston, Aaron J Livingston doing business as Gtwo also known as Clarke and Clarke
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Tulsa Police Department and Police/Fire/Emergency Dispatch - 911
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle-Giles v. Davis et al
as 5:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Edgar Royce Randle-Giles
Defendant:
Bradley Davis and Enid Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Michael D Johnson
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rowbotham v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00151
Petitioner:
Roger D Rowbotham
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Livingston v. Regalado
as 4:2024cv00153
Petitioner:
Aaron J Livingston
Respondent:
Vic Regalado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gibbs v. USA
as 4:2024cv00152
Petitioner:
Andrew Gibbs
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Christian v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00353
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
James Cornelius Christian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Purdy v. Harpe
as 5:2024cv00348
Petitioner:
Aaron C Purdy
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00341
Petitioner:
Harry Garcia
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
